Affordable housing
3.35 Government Guidance is clear that the provision of adequate
amounts of affordable housing is critical to mixed and balanced
communities. The planning system is an important element in the
delivery of affordable housing. The delivery of affordable housing
is a Corporate Priority of the Council. Poverty and high house
prices in relation to incomes is a recognised problem within
Torbay, and this generates a need for the provision of affordable
housing. Affordable housing is housing that is available to people
who cannot afford to rent or buy houses generally available on
the open market. PPG3 and Circular 6/98 ‘Affordable Housing’ use
the term ‘affordable housing’ to encompass both social
(subsidised) and low cost market housing. However, the Government’s
consultation document ‘Influencing the size type and affordability
of housing’ (2003) indicates that affordability should
be defined in terms of local income levels and house prices/rents
for different types of housing. Planning policies on affordable
housing should be based on an up to date assessment of housing
need.
3.36 The Council’s former Housing Needs Survey (HNS) was
produced by David Couttie Associates in 1997. The two key issues
highlighted by the survey were the problem of affordability,
with a large proportion of Torbay’s population living on
relatively low incomes, and the level of ‘concealed’ households,
i.e. living within an existing household, the vast majority of
whom were not recorded on a register of housing need. The survey
advocated that up to 30% or 100 new homes per annum of the remaining
Structure Plan provision should be for social housing, principally
for rent. In addition it identified a need for 35 units of low
cost market housing per year. 3.37 The Council’s 2003 Housing
Needs Survey, carried out by Fordham Research, identified a much
higher level of housing need in Torbay than found by the 1997
Survey. It revealed that there was a need for 1816 units of affordable
housing per year over the next five years to meet housing need.
It found that around three quarters of this need was for social
rented housing, due to the gap between house prices and incomes.
The level of housing need identified by the 2003 Housing Needs
Survey is comparable with inner London, and meeting it is clearly
not achievable, as it amounts to over four times the average
total house building rate in Torbay. However the figure does
indicate an exceptional level of need for affordable housing
in Torbay.
3.38 It is envisaged that the Local Plan’s affordable
housing provision, which aims to provide at least 135 new units
of affordable housing a year, will be found over a wide variety
of sites. Policy H5 relates to affordable housing
on identified sites. It is also recognised that a number of unidentified
(windfall) sites, including some sites where it is proposed to
renew extant or lapsed consents, should contain an element of
affordable housing. Policy H6 outlines the criteria
for considering whether windfall sites are appropriate for affordable
housing.
3.39 Circular 6/98 (paragraph 15 et seq.) advises that Local
Plans should ensure that affordable housing is occupied by those
who need it and provides guidance for ensuring that affordable
housing meets local needs without being unduly restrictive on
developers. Further guidance on the provision of affordable housing
through planning policy is set out in the Council’s Supplementary
Planning Guidance on the Provision of Affordable Housing in Torbay (Adopted
September 2003). Partnership working between planning, housing
and registered social landlords is important to the successful
operation of affordable housing policies. The Torbay Housing
Partnership Strategy (2003-2006) addresses wider issues such
as management, stock condition, homelessness and supporting people.
3.40 In order to achieve balanced communities, the Council aims
to achieve the development of affordable housing in small clusters
rather than in large estates, irrespective of the overall size
of the proposed development. This is set out in Policy
H9 Layout design and community aspects. Moreover, the
Council intends to ensure that adequate social infrastructure
is provided to support major new housing development (see Policies
CF6 and CF7).
3.41 It is important to ensure that the Local Plan pays attention
to specialised housing needs and these are addressed in Policies
H5 and H10, as well as Policy
CF15, which deals with a range of accommodation for
people in need of care.
Making best use of the housing stock
3.42 Central to the Council’s strategy of minimising greenfield
development, is making the best use of the existing housing stock.
Torbay has around 60,500 dwellings (April 2004), about one fifth
of it dating back to Victorian times. The Council intends generally
to prevent the loss of housing to other uses (Policy
H8) unless this would contribute to other key local
plan objectives. The Local Plan also seeks to make optimum use
of existing housing stock in order to encourage sustainable urban
communities and is pursuing an empty homes strategy to reduce
the number of empty properties in Torbay. An important issue
for Torbay is the need to provide clear policy guidance on houses
in multi-occupation (HMOs), which on the one hand provide much
needed affordable housing and yet can present serious environmental
health and planning problems. Policy H7 addresses
HMOs.
3.43 In recent years the Council has recognised the increasing
problems of under-use of town centre premises and the potential
of using this resource for meeting housing needs, as well as
the desirability of reintroducing residential communities into
our town centres. The involvement of housing associations in
schemes such as Living Over the Shop (LOTS) has given added security
to the shopkeepers below, thereby enabling this potential accommodation
to be realised. Policy H4 covers the sub-division
of properties into flats, whilst Policy H3 promotes
residential accommodation in town centres. Residential accommodation
will often be part of town centre mixed use developments (see Policy
S2).
Rural areas
3.44 The rural areas of Torbay are generally also a working
environment for the farming community. The Local Plan restricts
residential development in the countryside and sets out the criteria
for assessing housing for agricultural or forestry workers (Policy
H12). Policy H14 sets out criteria
for travelling peoples’ caravan sites.
3.45 The effect of the continued and future use of residential
caravans in the rural areas of Torbay is addressed by Policy
H13.
Layout, design and amenity considerations
3.46 The Council intends to encourage the provision of a wide
range of housing. However, this must not be at the expense of
the environment enjoyed by the residents of Torbay. The Local
Plan is supplemented by the Environmental Guide which gives guidance
on the layout, design, access, amenity, security and the use
of natural features to be taken into consideration in determining
applications for new housing development. Policy H9 also
deals with layout, design and community issues. The satisfactory
provision of amenity open space is essential to providing greener
urban environments and is addressed in Policy H11.
3.47 PPG3 stresses that local authorities should increase the
density of development at and around places with good public
transport accessibility to help minimise the take-up of greenfield
sites. Land for housing in Torbay is scarce and the use of land,
at densities which are as high as possible whilst being compatible
with the character of surrounding areas, is encouraged. It also
recognised that a blanket density coverage for the whole of Torbay
is neither desirable nor appropriate in design or sustainability
terms. PPG3 suggests that developments of less than 30 dwellings
per hectare should be avoided (paragraphs 57 - 58). Policy
H10 of the Local Plan covers density considerations. Policy
H15 sets out considerations relating to applications
for extensions to domestic properties.
HOUSING POLICIES AND PROPOSALS
HS Housing strategy
A sustainable housing strategy will be promoted
which aims to meet Torbay’s housing requirements through:-
(1) giving everyone the opportunity of a decent
home and so promote social cohesion, well-being and self-dependence;
(2) providing a mix and choice of housing of
a balanced range of size, type and location to meet the needs
of different types of household;
(3) securing a balance between:-
- new housing and the protection of environmental
quality; and
- new housing and jobs;
(4) maximisation of the reuse of urban land
and buildings with a target of 65% for Torbay of all housing
development over the Plan period;
(5) implementing a sequential approach to make
full and effective use of urban land by:-
- ensuring best use of housing stock and
supporting new windfall housing developments on previously
used urban sites; and
- permitting only the remaining part of the
residual new housing requirement that cannot be met on previously
developed urban land on allocated greenfield sites, subject
to phasing over the Plan period; and
(6) generating sustainable patterns of residential
development at optimum densities in safe and attractive environments,
accessible by a variety of means of transport.
Explanation:
3.48 The Local Plan sets the framework for provision of housing
in Torbay, to meet the target of 6200 new dwellings set out in
the Adopted Devon Structure Plan First Review (1999).
3.49 The Local Plan housing strategy also incorporates the Government’s
housing policy set out in PPG3 ‘Housing’ (2000) and ‘Planning
for the Communities of the Future’ (1998). Central to this
is a move away from ‘predict and provide’ to a regime
of ‘plan, monitor and manage’.
3.50 It is important to conserve greenfield sites, many of which
are protected by landscape or nature conservation designations.
At the same time it is essential to meet people’s need
for homes, both for market and affordable housing. Failure to
do so would lead to housing shortages and increased social exclusion.
Moreover, failure to meet the Structure Plan target could result
in planning by appeal and place Torbay’s most valuable
rural assets at risk.
3.51 The Local Plan housing strategy seeks to meet housing needs
whilst minimising greenfield development, by adopting a sequential
approach of making the best use of existing housing stock - including
empty homes - followed by the development of previously used ‘brownfield’ land.
Annex C of PPG3 defines previously developed land as “land
which is or was occupied by a permanent structure (excluding
agricultural or forestry buildings), and associated fixed surface
infrastructure. The definition covers the curtilage of the development.” This
definition excludes parks, allotments etc. which may have some
structures in them, and previously developed sites that have
become blended into the landscape so that they could be reasonably
considered as part of the natural surroundings. The Council has
undertaken an Urban Housing Potential Study (a supplementary
document to the Plan) to assess the potential from smaller windfall
sites.
3.52 Greenfield sites, identified in Policy H1 are
only released to cover the housing need that cannot be met on
brownfield sites. It is estimated that 65% of housing provision
in Torbay will be achieved on previously developed land. This
is above the national target of 60% by 2008 (PPG3 paragraph 23)
and 50% for the South West as set out in the Regional Planning
Guidance for the South West (RPG 10 - September 2001).
3.53 Release of greenfield sites will be split into two phases
(1995-2005 and 2006-2011) and completions of housing will be
monitored over the Plan period to ensure that housing development
does not outstrip Structure Plan provision (see Policy
H1A).
3.54 In order to make the best use of urban land, higher density
housing is encouraged, where appropriate (Policy H10).
However residential development will also be expected to provide
adequate open space (Policy H11) and incorporate
a high standard of design (Policies BES and BE1)
to ensure attractive and sustainable living environments.
H1 New housing on identified sites
The policies of this Plan provide the capacity
for the completion of 6200 dwellings, in accordance with the
Devon Structure Plan, between April 1995 and March 2011, as indicated
in Figure 10. As part of this total, housing development will
be permitted on the large sites listed in Table 1 below, which
have an estimated capacity for 1031 dwellings. Proposals for
housing development on these sites will need to have regard to
the footnotes to the table. Permission will not be granted for
housing on any large greenfield sites other than those identified.
Explanation:
3.55 As noted in Policy HS, the Local Plan
seeks to maximise the use of urban sites and utilise existing
buildings. It has regard to the sequential approach to releasing
land outlined in PPG3 ‘Housing’ (2000). However,
notwithstanding the importance of this approach, some large housing
sites are required to meet the area’s housing requirement
that cannot be accommodated through conversions or on previously
developed land. Policy H1 identifies large sites
to meet around 48% of the residual housing need (i.e. an estimated
completion of at least 885 dwellings as a percentage of the residual
housing need of 1852 dwellings as of 2001) after allowance has
been made for the number of dwellings already committed, completed
or under construction (see Figure 10). This
total, together with an allowance made for windfall sites (see Policy
H2), satisfies the Structure Plan housing requirement
and continues to ensure a five-year supply of land for house
building.
3.56 Some of the sites identified in Policy H1 have
received planning permission. However, it is considered appropriate
to include them in this proposal because several sites have remained
undeveloped for a considerable period since the granting of planning
permission and other sites only have outline consent. All these
sites will be due for renewal within the Plan period if implementation
has not commenced. The Council is reaffirming through Policy
H1 its commitment towards their satisfactory implementation.
3.57 The release of further large sites for new housing in addition
to those identified in Policy H1 would be contrary
to the Devon Structure Plan which proposes a more constrained
approach to house building in the Torbay area.
3.58 All the sites identified should be developed in accordance
with the relevant provisions and guidelines set out in the Local
Plan, including the Environmental Guide, and those policies relating
to design, layout and amenity (Policies H9, H10 and H11).
In addition, a number of important considerations are identified
in this proposal in relation to the development of individual
sites.
3.59 Several sites are allocated for affordable housing development
(including social housing), either in their entirety or as part
of a mixed development with general needs market housing. Footnote
A in Table 1 indicates where an element of affordable
housing will be sought. Where other sites yield significantly
larger numbers of dwellings than suggested in Table 1,
the Council will consider whether it is appropriate to seek an
element of affordable housing provision, having regard to current
Government guidance and evidence of local need. Developers and
others with an interest in these sites are referred to Policies
H5, H6, H9and the
Council’s Adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance ‘The
Provision of Affordable Housing in Torbay’ which deal with
these issues in more detail.
Table 1: Housing Policy H1 - New housing on
identified sites
Site name
|
Policy implications
|
Green-
field
|
Brown-
field
|
Total (1999-2011)
|
Phase1 (1995-2005)
|
Phase2 (2006-2011)
|
TORQUAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Scotts Bridge/Barton Phase 2C
|
BCDEFG
|

|
|
80
|
-
|
80
|
2. Scotts Bridge/Barton Phase 2A
|
ABCDEFGS*
|
|
|
(257)
|
(257)
|
-
|
3. Hatchcombe Lane, Scotts Bridge/Barton
|
ABCDEFGS
|

|
|
40
|
40
|
-
|
4. Scotts Bridge/Barton Phase 2B
|
ABCDEFGS
|

|
|
40
|
-
|
40
|
5. Fore Street, Watcombe
|
AB*
|
|

|
(60)
|
(60)
|
-
|
6. Haldane, Barton
|
F
|
|

|
15
|
15
|
-
|
7. Hawkins Avenue
|
BEFG
|

|
|
30
|
30
|
-
|
8. Palace Grounds
|
X
|
|

|
(35)
|
(35)
|
-
|
9. The Terrace Car Park
|
|
|

|
40
|
40
|
-
|
10. Hollicombe Gasworks
|
BCEFS
|
|

|
50
|
25
|
25
|
PAIGNTON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Great Parks, Phase 2
|
ABCEFGS
|

|
|
185
|
-
|
185
|
12. Great Parks, Phase 2
|
ABCEFGS
|

|
|
115
|
-
|
115
|
13. Great Parks, Phase 2
|
ABCEFGS
|

|
|
65
|
-
|
65
|
14. Station Lane
|
ABCEFS (See also Proposal TM7)
|
|

|
40
|
20
|
20
|
15. Zoo Car Park
|
AX
|
|

|
(45)
|
-
|
(45)
|
16. Primley Dairy, Waterleat Road
|
AC
|
|

|
40
|
20
|
20
|
17. Seafield Hotel, Dartmouth Road
|
CF
|
|

|
20
|
20
|
-
|
BRIXHAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Brixham Town Centre
|
ABCF
|
|

|
20
|
-
|
20
|
19. Paint Station
|
AX
|
|

|
(15)
|
(15)
|
-
|
20. Mudstone Lane
|
AFG
|

|
|
(40)
|
-
|
(40)
|
21. St Mary's
|
ACF
|
|

|
25
|
-
|
25
|
22. Former Dolphin Holiday Camp
|
ABCDEFG (See Proposal H1.22(A))
|

[96]
|

[130]
|
226
|
186
|
40
|
ESTIMATED TOTAL
|
|
651
|
380
|
1031
|
396
|
635
|
Notes:
The above table provides for 1031 dwellings, which is 10 dwellings less
than shown in Figure 12 ‘Meeting the Structure Plan Requirement’.
This is because Figure 12 includes Livermead, Torquay (former Revised
Deposit H1.10) which obtained outline permission during the Plan preparation
period and was therefore deleted as an H1 proposal (Modification no.
3.14), but is still counted as an H1 site in the calculation of Figure
12.
A Subsidised affordable housing, completely or in part (see Policy
H5 Affordable housing on identified sites)
B Planning Brief in existence or required
C Detailed Phasing agreement needed
D Site of ecological importance, identified in the Torbay Wildlife
Survey (1998) (see Policy NC3 Protected sites - locally
important sites)
E Physical infrastructure requirement (see Policies
INS Infrastructure Strategy, IN1 Water, drainage
and sewerage infrastructure and WS Waste management
and disposal strategy)
F Community provision requirement (see Policies CFS
Sustainable communities strategy, CF6 Community
infrastructure contributions, CF7 Educational
contributions, S11 New Local Centres and H11
Open space requirements for new housing)
G Strategic landscaping requirement (see Policy L10
Major development and landscaping)
S These sites have been identified by the Environment Agency
as requiring care to avoid flooding. Where possible, sustainable
drainage measures should be employed (see Policy EP11
Flood control)
* Sites committed at April 2000 (site yields in brackets)
X Other sites committed at April 2000 which are close to expiry
(site yields in brackets)
The potential yields of the committed sites (in brackets) have
not been included in the total for Proposal H1 in order to avoid
double counting i.e. they are included within the committed dwellings
total for Torbay. However, they have been included in Proposal
H1 to indicate the Council’s commitment to their development
and an indication of their phasing has been included.
Note that the housing figures are approximate (to the nearest
5 dwellings) and actual yield from sites may vary depending on
detailed site considerations.
Large sites are those of 0.4 hectares (1 acre) and above, as
defined in Government Guidance.
3.60 The remaining phases of the two largest sites at Scotts
Bridge/Barton and Great Parks only have outline planning approvals
for the development areas in their entirety. Where there are
no full planning permissions, they have been treated as fresh
Local Plan proposals, with their estimated yields included in
the H1 total. However, the yields from the other H1 sites which
had planning permission in April 1999 have not been included
in the H1 total but they are included instead in the planning
permission total in Figure 12. There has been
no double counting.
3.61 The Council has approved planning briefs for Scotts Bridge/Barton
and Great Parks, and areas covered by Phase 1 of these briefs
- which already have full planning permission and where implementation
is well under way - are identified on the Proposals Map. The
Council is committed to achieving a balanced community in a safeguarded
and attractive environmental setting in these areas, both within
the phases which already have planning permission and in those
areas which are currently only covered by Local Plan Proposals.
The approved briefs provide detailed guidance on land use, access,
phasing, co-ordination of infrastructure and environmental management,
and development proposals will be expected to reflect the guiding
principles in these briefs.
3.62 At Scotts Bridge/Barton, phasing is needed to secure the
provision of physical infrastructure, strategic landscaping,
affordable housing as set out in Policy H5 and
an orderly progression of development. Development to the north-east
of this site is likely to continue into Phase 2 of the Plan period
(Policies H1.1 - H1.4).
3.63 At Great Parks, phasing restrictions have been required
to ensure that housing is initially restricted to a total which
does not overload the existing King Ash Road, with the achievement
of greater numbers linked to the implementation of findings contained
within the Western Corridor Study (Policies H1.11 - H1.13).
3.64 The site of the former Great Parks Lakes would be used
as part of the surface water drainage scheme to serve the Great
Parks development. It would be able to cope with up to a 1 in
100-year flood. There would be no permanent depth of water, with
the exception of a few shallow pools or ‘teardrop’ lakes
for wildlife purposes.
3.65 Particular attention is drawn to the design aspects of
several sites in this proposal.
3.66 Haldane, Barton (H1.6) contains derelict
houses formerly used for educational purposes and offers scope
for a small well designed housing scheme.
3.67 The Terrace Car Park (H1.9) is located
close to Torquay town centre and harbour with good access to
facilities. Opportunities exist for a small residential scheme
at the north eastern end of the site, on the edge of the car
park, subject to the entire area not being required for car parking
to serve the Waterfront Scheme (see Policies TU1 and TU2).
3.68 Hawkins Avenue, Chelston (H1.7), whilst
being a greenfield site, is under utilised and secluded land
that has given rise to concerns about public safety. It is important
that trees in and around the site which make a major contribution
to the setting and character of the area are protected. It is
desirable that an existing informal path over the site is retained
and that developer contributions are made towards community facilities
to serve the development.
3.69 Hollicombe Gasworks (H1.10) is likely
to become available during the Plan period and is a brownfield
site suitable for housing. Any contamination on site will need
to be eradicated (see Policy EP7) and the site
rendered suitable for use. The site is important in landscape
terms and development will need to preserve the area’s
integrity as a gap between Torquay and Paignton. The valley sides
outside this site will be safeguarded from development. In addition,
there is scope for part of the site to be used as public open
space. Such community gains will be sought through a Section
106 agreement.
3.70 The Seafield Hotel (H1.17) is a brownfield
site in a highly accessible location close to local community
facilities. The housing development should be of a character
and density appropriate to the location and surrounding area.
3.71 Residential development in Brixham Town Centre (H1.18)
is expected to form an integral part of any redevelopment scheme,
and design guidelines will be included in the planning brief
for the site. The anticipated yield is a reflection of the relatively
modest scale of the proposed town centre development scheme,
in keeping with the sensitive urban grain of the centre of Brixham.
3.72 New housing is proposed at the former Dolphin Holiday Camp.
See Policy H1.22(A).
3.73 The St. Mary’s development (H1.21)
is expected to include the refurbishment of the existing buildings,
which contribute greatly to the character of that part of the
town.
3.74 Several sites are known to be of ecological significance
and environmental appraisals or full statements will be required
in these situations. All or part of Scotts Bridge/Barton and
Great Parks are within Local Wildlife Sites (see Policy
NC3). Where sites are known to contain the habitats
of protected species, developers will need to have regard to
the provisions of the Wildlife and Countryside Acts 1981 and
1985 and the Badger Act 1991. The Local Authority will consult
with relevant bodies such as English Nature and Devon Wildlife
Trust to ensure that development schemes make adequate provision
to protect wildlife habitats.
3.75 Attention is drawn to sites which have ground contamination
or geological problems and developers will need to have regard
to Policies EP7 and EP8.
H1.22A Former Dolphin Holiday Camp, Brixham
The development of new housing at the former
Dolphin Holiday Camp (H1.22) is proposed for an estimated 226
dwellings, subject to the following:-
(i) The development shall be implemented in a
fully comprehensive manner in accordance with the principles
set out in the Planning Brief and the requirements of the two
development zones which are identified on the Proposals Map.
(ii) In Zone C (coastal fringe of the AONB):-
a) Exceptional design quality is required to
ensure that development will be assimilated into the landscape
and designed to respect the existing site levels.
b) Natural features should dominate, not built
elements.
c) Building colours must be recessive, with
natural colour rendering.
d) The maximum density permitted is 20 dwellings
per hectare, with buildings situated within a robust landscape
setting with large plots or shared landscape framework.
e) Careful control over the height and massing
of buildings is required.
f) Lighting must be specially designed with
low-level fixtures to avoid light pollution.
(iii) In Zone U (urban fringe of the AONB):-
a) Particular attention must be given to design
and layout of the site in this area so that it is compatible
with the urban form of Brixham.
b) A density of 30-50 dwellings per hectare
is considered appropriate for most of this zone.
c) Existing natural features should be respected.
d) Careful control over the height and massing
of buildings is required.
(iv) The development shall be implemented in
two phases, with 186 dwellings in Phase 1 and 40 dwellings (in
the West Star field) in Phase 2.
(v) Sustainable transport penetration, including
a loop road, necessary off-site improvements, effective access
and circulation for pedestrians, cyclists and buses, is required.
The line of the loop road as it passes through the field to the
south-west of the area allocated for housing is shown indicatively
on the Proposals Map. Specific wildlife conservation measures
are required in this field, including the protection and management
of foraging areas for bats.
(vi) A local shopping centre, located on or adjacent
to the southern access point of the loop road with Briseham Road,
is required to be developed as an integral part of Phase 1, to
comprise at least 3 retail units with residential accommodation
above.
(vii) At least 30% of the dwellings in both phases
should be developed for subsidised affordable housing, i.e. at
least 68 dwellings.
(viii)Public pedestrian access from Briseham
Road to the South Devon Coast Path should be provided as part
of the development.
(ix) Advanced peripheral and other structural
tree planting and landscaping is required.
(x) Development will be permitted only after
an AONB recovery and management plan has been approved by the
Council.
(xi) Wildlife protection measures will be required,
including corridors for the flight of bats and provision for
the protection and management of the field to the south-west
of the housing allocation as a foraging areas for bats.
Explanation:
3.76 This special policy has been introduced in the light of
the importance of the AONB, the site’s proximity to a candidate
Special Area of Conservation and landscape, flora, fauna and
other sustainability considerations in the development of the
former Dolphin Holiday Park site. Nevertheless, it represents
a significant brownfield opportunity, which if properly developed,
will help relieve pressure on greenfield sites elsewhere in Torbay.
Development for housing on this site will only be acceptable
as part of a package of sustainable development measures which
include protection of the area’s landscape and wildlife
value. This includes the recovery of some of the AONB from derelict
chalet development to its natural state. In addition, ongoing
management measures, affordable housing provision, sustainable
transport penetration, appropriate community facilities (including
a new Local Centre - see Proposal S11.3) will
be required. The Council is seeking the reclamation of the most
sensitive part of the AONB which currently contains derelict
chalet development for open space and public access. The site
is the habitat of the horseshoe bat which is a protected species
(see Policies NC1, NC2 and NC5).
3.77 A Planning Brief will be prepared as Supplementary
Planning Guidance within the terms of this policy to ensure that
the site is developed in a comprehensive manner. The Brief will
set out:-
a) the design, landscaping and density requirements of the
main residential areas, based on the two zones set out in this
policy;
b) main pedestrian circulation, cycle routes, parking provision,
road layout, and sustainable transport arrangements;
c) traffic calming measures/closure of the central section
of Briseham Road to vehicular traffic;
d) provision of infrastructure, including water supply, sustainable
drainage and energy;
e) provision of the local centre; and
f) the provision of amenity open space and recreational/play
areas and facilities.
The Brief will also set out detailed requirements for any development
proposal to meet the provisions of Policy H1.22.
3.78 A Section 106 Agreement under the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 will be required to secure necessary off-site highway
improvements, off-site landscaping and recovery/management of
the AONB, affordable housing, education contributions, leisure
contributions and bus subsidy.
H1A The management of housing provision through
phasing
Development on the greenfield sites listed in
Table 1 of Policy H1 (noted in the third column) will be phased.
Permission will not be granted for the second phase (commencing
April 2006) unless there is evidence of a likely material under-provision
of dwellings measured through the monitoring of completions in
accordance with Policies HS, H1 and H5.
If monitoring reveals a materially higher capacity
for development on previously-developed (brownfield) land than
assumed in the Plan (Figure 10), including on those sites annotated
B in Table 1, permission will not be granted for the development
of Phase 2 sites unless and until there is a requirement for
the development of Phase 2 sites to achieve the total Local Plan
housing provision required by Policy H1.
However, permission may otherwise be granted
for the whole or part of a second phase site where this would
facilitate sustainable development, including the provision of
community facilities, affordable housing or for access by public
transport.
In addition, consideration will be given to the
serving of completion notices on greenfield sites where development
has ceased and where planning permission would not be granted
for the renewal of any permission in accordance with the policies
of this plan.
Explanation:
3.79 As noted in paragraph 3.55 of Policy H1,
some large housing sites are required to meet the area’s
housing requirement that cannot be accommodated through conversions
or on previously developed land. The greenfield sites allocated
for housing in the Plan under Policy H1 are
noted in the third column of Table 1. These are divided into
two phases for the completion of dwellings (1995-2006 and 2006-2011).
Completions of housing will be monitored over the Plan period
in order to:-
(i) ensure that enough dwellings are built to meet the total
Local Plan housing provision of 6200 new dwellings completed
between 1995 and 2011; and
(ii) enable the Local Plan to meet its target of 65% of new
housing provision on brownfield sites, as stated in Policy
HS(4), by regulating the release of greenfield sites for new
housing development.
3.80 In keeping with the spirit of PPG3 and the sustainable
development agenda, it is important to ensure that the greenfield
sites allocated in Policy H1 are not implemented
at a disproportionately faster rate than the brownfield sites
in Torbay. The Council therefore intends to monitor the situation
carefully and planning permissions for new greenfield sites will
not automatically be granted if there is a serious risk of the
Local Plan target of 65% of new housing provision on brownfield
sites not being implemented, as set out in paragraph 3.23, unless
significant community advantages can be demonstrated by the developer
to the satisfaction of the Council.
3.81 The phasing strategy will be monitored on an annual basis.
If this monitoring suggests a persistent and significant difference
between the actual rate of housing completions and that assumed
in the Plan, on both brownfield and greenfield land and in the
balance between them, then action will be taken in accordance
with Policy H1A. It is expected that the results of the annual
Housing Land Survey and a new Urban Capacity Study will permit
a review of the phasing strategy before the critical date of
April 2006 when it might be expected that planning permission
would be forthcoming for the phase two sites. At that date it
might be expected that there have been 3880 housing completions
since 1995 of which 2520 should have been on previously developed
land. Any re-assignment of sites between phases, prior to any
review of this Local Plan, will be the subject of Supplementary
Planning Guidance which will be made available on public consultation
before approval.
3.82 Any existing planning permissions for housing development
on greenfield sites, should they lapse, will be re-assessed in
accordance with the policies in this plan. In some cases, a minimal
amount of development may take place in order to keep such permissions ‘alive’.
In those circumstances the effect of the serving of a completion
notice under s.94 of the 1990 Act (subject to approval by the
Secretary of State) is to cause the permission to lapse should
development not be completed by the specified date.
|